Dr Scott Masson
Dr Scott Masson
  • 806
  • 971 639
William Shakespeare, The Tempest, Acts 2-5
❤️ If you find my channel helpful, become a channel member: ua-cam.com/users/DrScottMasson
❤️ Subscribe to my Substack: drscottmasson.substack.com/
❤️ Support my channel and assist me in providing better content:
www.paypal.com/donate/?token=FZN9nCjKxWQNUnF_jsASfpjiVyRpj1H_mdGvxmYj9wIO-ZgrxM5vR1V-nTy3kKygP1gh10&fromUL=true&country.x=CA&locale.x=en_US/?token=FZN9nCjKxWQNUnF_jsASfpjiVyRpj1H_mdGvxmYj9wIO-ZgrxM5vR1V-nTy3kKygP1gh10&fromUL=true&country.x=CA&locale.x=en_US
Переглядів: 292

Відео

William Shakespeare, The Tempest, Act 1, Scene 2
Переглядів 2673 місяці тому
❤️ If you find my channel helpful, become a channel member: ua-cam.com/users/DrScottMasson ❤️ Subscribe to my Substack: drscottmasson.substack.com/ ❤️ Support my channel and assist me in providing better content: www.paypal.com/donate/?token=FZN9nCjKxWQNUnF_jsASfpjiVyRpj1H_mdGvxmYj9wIO-ZgrxM5vR1V-nTy3kKygP1gh10&fromUL=true&country.x=CA&locale.x=en_US/?token=FZN9nCjKxWQNUnF_jsASfpjiVyRpj1H_mdGvx...
George Orwell, 1984, Part 3
Переглядів 3033 місяці тому
❤️ If you find my channel helpful, become a channel member: ua-cam.com/users/DrScottMasson ❤️ Subscribe to my Substack: drscottmasson.substack.com/ ❤️ Support my channel and assist me in providing better content: www.paypal.com/donate/?token=FZN9nCjKxWQNUnF_jsASfpjiVyRpj1H_mdGvxmYj9wIO-ZgrxM5vR1V-nTy3kKygP1gh10&fromUL=true&country.x=CA&locale.x=en_US/?token=FZN9nCjKxWQNUnF_jsASfpjiVyRpj1H_mdGvx...
Towards a Christian Literary Theory
Переглядів 8024 місяці тому
In the following, I conclude tbe course of two semesters by suggesting some outlines of a Christian literary theory. ❤️ If you find my channel helpful, become a channel member: ua-cam.com/users/DrScottMasson ❤️ Subscribe to my Substack: drscottmasson.substack.com/ ❤️ Support my channel and assist me in providing better content: www.paypal.com/donate/?token=FZN9nCjKxWQNUnF_jsASfpjiVyRpj1H_mdGvxm...
Shakespeare, The Tempest, Act One, Scene 1
Переглядів 2694 місяці тому
Shakespeare, The Tempest, Act One, Scene 1
Shakespeare, The Tempest, Introduction
Переглядів 4004 місяці тому
Shakespeare, The Tempest, Introduction
George Orwell, 1984, Part Two
Переглядів 3854 місяці тому
George Orwell, 1984, Part Two
Posthumanism
Переглядів 8584 місяці тому
Posthumanism
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 5
Переглядів 1724 місяці тому
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 5
George Orwell, 1984 Part One
Переглядів 4264 місяці тому
George Orwell, 1984 Part One
George Orwell, 1984 Introduction
Переглядів 5204 місяці тому
George Orwell, 1984 Introduction
Transhumanism
Переглядів 4614 місяці тому
Transhumanism
Transhumanism
Переглядів 6704 місяці тому
Transhumanism
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Acts 3 & 4
Переглядів 2604 місяці тому
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Acts 3 & 4
Shakespeare, Hamlet and Ophelia
Переглядів 2194 місяці тому
Shakespeare, Hamlet and Ophelia
The Abolition of Man in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World
Переглядів 4784 місяці тому
The Abolition of Man in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World
Shakespeare's Hamlet and The Meaning of his Dramaturge Figures
Переглядів 2534 місяці тому
Shakespeare's Hamlet and The Meaning of his Dramaturge Figures
Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
Переглядів 6444 місяці тому
Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
Hamlet, Acts 1 and 2
Переглядів 3244 місяці тому
Hamlet, Acts 1 and 2
W B Yeats, Selected Poems
Переглядів 5404 місяці тому
W B Yeats, Selected Poems
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 1, scene 1
Переглядів 4044 місяці тому
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 1, scene 1
Michel Foucault and Queer Theory
Переглядів 1 тис.4 місяці тому
Michel Foucault and Queer Theory
William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Introduction
Переглядів 4784 місяці тому
William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Introduction
Joseph Conrad, The Heart of Darkness and the Horror of Efficiency
Переглядів 5654 місяці тому
Joseph Conrad, The Heart of Darkness and the Horror of Efficiency
From Orientalism to Postcolonialism
Переглядів 6364 місяці тому
From Orientalism to Postcolonialism
Shakespeare, King Lear, Acts 4 & 5
Переглядів 1804 місяці тому
Shakespeare, King Lear, Acts 4 & 5
Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness, Part 1
Переглядів 3614 місяці тому
Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness, Part 1
The Scramble for African in Nominally Christian Europe
Переглядів 2154 місяці тому
The Scramble for African in Nominally Christian Europe
Roland Barthes' The Death of the Author and The Death of God
Переглядів 8304 місяці тому
Roland Barthes' The Death of the Author and The Death of God
Shakespeare, King Lear, Act 3
Переглядів 2014 місяці тому
Shakespeare, King Lear, Act 3

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @elel2608
    @elel2608 2 години тому

    5:02

  • @astralascendance
    @astralascendance 17 годин тому

    Sounds like a Psychologist for sure. I'm curious as to the portion of the lecture this was taken from. I feel like I'm missing alot of context lol

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 16 годин тому

      ua-cam.com/video/0QsnNzFq9cs/v-deo.htmlsi=SVPx1U2hg3rjd9vU

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 16 годин тому

      I’m no psychologist

    • @astralascendance
      @astralascendance 16 годин тому

      @@LitProf Ah, apologies. The interdisciplinary influences and academic background make your expressions similar. I was too quick to generalize. Thank you for the context, I'm interested!

  • @flaviusarcadiusvibes
    @flaviusarcadiusvibes 17 годин тому

    Im not sure there is a class behind the camera

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 17 годин тому

      There is. From my History of Literary Theory lecture.

  • @tiagomelo5761
    @tiagomelo5761 День тому

    Professor, your example of the pendulum between "art for art's sake" and art as a form of social justice was one of the most compelling and sensible explanations with which I've ever come across to wrap my head around the crisis that has been consuming and undermining the humanities in general. Thank you. Your lessons are a treasure trove and a balm to me.

  • @woogie6785
    @woogie6785 3 дні тому

    It can’t be at the expense of the Truth.

  • @uberdonkey9721
    @uberdonkey9721 3 дні тому

    Damn social scientists. This os imprecise. You could say exactly the same about Nazism. Now please.. use logic, not poltical opinion.

  • @raymondjensen1515
    @raymondjensen1515 3 дні тому

    Kind of sounds like he was saying, allbeit in a dressed up way, that only people who took specific academic classes were capable of being moral.

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 3 дні тому

      I certainly was not saying that.

  • @tonyschfld
    @tonyschfld 3 дні тому

    Indoctrination

  • @shawnmcilroy
    @shawnmcilroy 3 дні тому

    Liberal doesn't work anymore.

  • @MichaelSmith-fg8xh
    @MichaelSmith-fg8xh 3 дні тому

    I think he's confusing the ideal of a liberal education with the current reality

  • @canadianpatriot9566
    @canadianpatriot9566 3 дні тому

    Liberal education has obviously been a great waste of time, like sociology. .. it has led to generations of people dependent on the system. People too stupid to figure it out.

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 3 дні тому

      I’m not sure. It’s just that liberal education needs the immune system of Christianity to keep out the viruses.

  • @susanstevenson3591
    @susanstevenson3591 3 дні тому

    It sounds good but it doesnt seem to he coming out that way these days

  • @yac2617
    @yac2617 4 дні тому

    Not too sure if you have read the book “A thousand heartbeats” by kiera cass

  • @IMENDRIDI-z2u
    @IMENDRIDI-z2u 4 дні тому

    ❤❤❤

  • @sportsfanivosevic9885
    @sportsfanivosevic9885 4 дні тому

    If this is true, then please explain why the Liberal educated West is responsible and complicit for most of the illegal wars after WW2.

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 4 дні тому

      Because it has not been liberally-educated in any significant numbers for 50 years.

  • @wayne4050
    @wayne4050 4 дні тому

    Jordan Peterson is a baffflegab master. Lots of words, little coherent meaning. His nonsensical religious diatribes are a perfect example.

    • @tyrone1309
      @tyrone1309 4 дні тому

      Yeah, no, bud.

    • @wayne4050
      @wayne4050 4 дні тому

      @@tyrone1309 How wonderfully eloquent a response. Why do you even bother?

    • @Vingul
      @Vingul 3 дні тому

      I’ve noticed he has become less and less self-aware in conversation, watched a short clip of his interview with Musk and he kept rudely interrupting Musk from making his points, really kept the convo at a surface level. But JBP’s worst fault is misdirecting people (especially young European men, of course) back into individualism. He’s very aware of what he’s doing in that sense.

    • @wayne4050
      @wayne4050 3 дні тому

      @@Vingul A pompous windbag who has somehow found an internet following.

    • @iamNotHereB
      @iamNotHereB 3 дні тому

      ​@Vingul his woret fault is claiming expertise in fields where he has none, which is largely everything outside of 2005 psychology

  • @Mojo59079
    @Mojo59079 4 дні тому

    I think you need to define “Liberal Education” very clearly to ascertain if the statement is true or false. Better yet let Jordan Peterson define it. The generalized statement is both true and false.

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 4 дні тому

      I think as a humanities professor I know better than a Psychologist.

    • @moesheen654
      @moesheen654 3 дні тому

      ​@@LitProfyour credentials gives your opinion no greater value than any person who experiences the world. I would say the same about JPs opinion.

  • @czarquetzal8344
    @czarquetzal8344 4 дні тому

    They claim that we're mere information. Foucalt is one of the precursors of this.

  • @MandM_IMO
    @MandM_IMO 4 дні тому

    No such thing as "liberal" education. It has been indoctrinated-fascist-intolerant teaching (not education), for quite a while now.

  • @austinrucker3853
    @austinrucker3853 5 днів тому

    Question: So, when Zeus says "that it is fated for him to return, and that there is a reason for his delay", is the reason for delay a consequence of Odysseus' free choice. Example when he boasts and proclaims his name to the cyclops. Is the reason to humble his boastfullness?

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 5 днів тому

      I think that could be argued, but ultimately it is because his actions anger Poseidon, and because the gods are the ultimate dramaturge figures (not men) he is prevented from returning for many years. Remember this account of Polyphemus is a flashback to events of the past, explaining why Odysseus has been delayed 10 years and has returned without any companions.

  • @noowi3153
    @noowi3153 5 днів тому

    Um you should watch barbie though

  • @bellringer929
    @bellringer929 6 днів тому

    A bit too dilatory

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 6 днів тому

      Have you read Wordsworth?

    • @bellringer929
      @bellringer929 6 днів тому

      @@LitProf been reading the prelude book 8

    • @bellringer929
      @bellringer929 6 днів тому

      @@LitProf i realize that my comment doesn't seem very complimentary but to me you're bringing too much into its explanation without going to specific lines which are slightly unclear or some thematic declaration.

    • @bellringer929
      @bellringer929 6 днів тому

      @@LitProf my comment is dilatory too i reckon

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 6 днів тому

      What I meant is that Wordsworth’s poetic style is rather dilatory.

  • @raystargazer7468
    @raystargazer7468 6 днів тому

    Paganism is superior to the christian nonsense.

  • @user-zt6cj6sn8i
    @user-zt6cj6sn8i 6 днів тому

    Totally true.

  • @dustinneely
    @dustinneely 6 днів тому

    Dr. Masson, have you ever read "Nihilism: The Root of the Revolution of the Modern Age" by Fr. Seraphim Rose? Many of the things you say remind me of Fr. Seraphim.

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 6 днів тому

      No I have not.

  • @mohamedyusuf4777
    @mohamedyusuf4777 7 днів тому

    I saw in the comments in a previous video that you got into a car accident. I hope you get better. You are one of the few Humanities professors that is pushing back against the hard postmodern bent of so many English professors. Before coming across your work I thought liberal arts departments were beyond saving, now I know that there are some in the field working hard to save it from consuming itself.

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 7 днів тому

      There aren’t that many, and the academy is trying to insure that there are none going forward. This channel is trying to keep the flame of learning alive by passing knowledge on, in a small way, to the next generation.

  • @dustinneely
    @dustinneely 7 днів тому

    I read the (Romanized) Butler translation of the Iliad last year. I just picked up the Rouse translation. I plan on reading all of the works you covered in this podcast. I already read Beowulf, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight & The Idylls of the King. Thank you for this! I'm 1/3 of the way through the Iliad re-read right now. This translation is much easier. I'll pick up the Lattimore translation later. Along with the Bible I will definitely be reading Homer over and over again. This is wonderful! Thank you so much. Blessings in Christ. 🙏☦️

  • @hafizazaib-un-nisa57
    @hafizazaib-un-nisa57 8 днів тому

    What are the names of the books you have recommended sir?

  • @zackdole6474
    @zackdole6474 8 днів тому

    One argument I have had against post humanism is "why do we feel guilty when animals don't" The fact that we can have remorse for our enemy beyond that of simple chemical responses is what separates us from nature.

  • @rafaelsakarya
    @rafaelsakarya 8 днів тому

    “Speaking of wonderful things” beautiful. That’s what literature should be about.

  • @Totallyfine29_
    @Totallyfine29_ 9 днів тому

    Reminded me of a reddit comment I came across recently, that was defending an abusing aggressive parent with the argument of “ don’t see anyone as merely good or evil, they’re just a person“ this could go wrong in a lot of scenarios as you can expect. In Arabic there’s the word “بصيرة” [Baseerah] which means vision literally but also implies the idea of the eye of the mind.A person could be blind physically but still have their mind vision and the opposite is correct. I suppose my SUBJECTIVE Islamic education provided me with way more inclusive language that I am greatly grateful for. ^edited to fix some punctuations:)

  • @MIIIM-7
    @MIIIM-7 9 днів тому

    #HermeneuticsDayOnefacebook

  • @user-dw6xh6rt9n
    @user-dw6xh6rt9n 10 днів тому

    All movements you mentioned are distinctly anti human. You people scare me intensely.

  • @mattlewis5095
    @mattlewis5095 10 днів тому

    20 fast-moving minutes of Bloom here from 30 years ago this year (in defence of his The Western Canon, 1994). ua-cam.com/video/S9ieF7LVbyI/v-deo.html

  • @mattlewis5095
    @mattlewis5095 10 днів тому

    Bloom always ‘lamented’ the replacing of the finest elements of the canon (such as Shakespeare himself ultimately) in core curriculum subjects especially, with more morally and culturally-motivated concerns above ones with competing literary merit. He made predictions that over the years came true. He stood up for what he believed to be right, and had millions of people behind him. He shouldered an enormous amount of abuse too. As a writer, very few have ever given more of themselves than he (an easy aspect to criticise). And he defended the ‘Western canon’ purely in terms of literary merit. I never heard him suggest that cultural studies should not exist. I never heard him say that great art does not have cultural or moral intention or merit. I find this kind of reformulation of Bloom, after his death in particular, as being ‘more of a comic than a critic’ to be nothing but an attempted ‘reorganisation’ of his absolutely undestroyable powers. If you want or need to pick up on his own slighting, slight with some (at least amusing?) wither and save us your ill-informed exaggerations please.

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 10 днів тому

      I was critical of what I read of Bloom while he was alive, for your information. And that’s while being an admirer and supporter of what he was against. I just don’t regard what he was ‘for’ to be a very good representation of the great books he championed. Oscar Wilde’s “Art for art’s sake” is pretty weak sauce.

  • @mattlewis5095
    @mattlewis5095 10 днів тому

    Of any central subject, Bloom was never as ill informed. You stand in his shadow

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 10 днів тому

      I’m sure your opinion is authoritative in your own mind.

  • @amishagoel
    @amishagoel 11 днів тому

    A lecture on Baudrillard, please!

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 11 днів тому

      That would be good. I don’t have any

  • @yac2617
    @yac2617 11 днів тому

    This was great!!!!

  • @czarquetzal8344
    @czarquetzal8344 12 днів тому

    The stimulus-response psychology ( Behaviorism) treats human like dogs and other lower forms of animals. It is the " scientific" counterpart of Post-Structuralism and Post-Humanism, which treat the subject ( human beings) as decentered.

  • @musinKanto
    @musinKanto 14 днів тому

    Are the values being attributed to the relation of the people of the time and Prometheus actually like that? Was he really bad because fire and subsequently bronze and iron are used among of many things, for people to kill each other?

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 13 днів тому

      I don’t really understand the question, but Prometheus stole fire from the gods, gave it to man, and they did bad things with it.

    • @musinKanto
      @musinKanto 12 днів тому

      Apologies for being unclear. I guess I can’t condensed all the questions I have but what I wanted to understand about where you depart from is: Is it safe to say Prometheus was seen by the contemporaries of those days as a bad actor or were those values of good and bad forced upon by later people? Or another way of saying it. Are we missing the point of mythical thinking role had on those people? And so another point could be for the question: if we’re engineering our psyche through a different language and a different standpoint, is it safe to say that the story of Prometheus we are repeating, could be a significantly different one from what it was originally conceived? And therefore not really connected to the time line?

  • @austinrucker3853
    @austinrucker3853 15 днів тому

    Thank you, Sir, for your lectures! I just stumbled over them a few days ago.

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 15 днів тому

      I have put a lot up there. The truth sets us free.

    • @austinrucker3853
      @austinrucker3853 14 днів тому

      @@LitProf Agreed! Where would you recommend one who is new to the study of literature / rediscovering the joys of reading to begin?

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 14 днів тому

      @austinrucker3853 Follow my lecture series on Introduction to Literature I & II

  • @metteheitmann1227
    @metteheitmann1227 16 днів тому

  • @czarquetzal8344
    @czarquetzal8344 17 днів тому

    Yes, didactic

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 17 днів тому

      But with moral example = paideia

    • @czarquetzal8344
      @czarquetzal8344 17 днів тому

      @@LitProf I really like your advocacy, Sir, unlike the usual " hermeneutics of suspicion".

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 16 днів тому

      @czarquetzal8344 Thanks

    • @czarquetzal8344
      @czarquetzal8344 16 днів тому

      @@LitProf where can I access your writings, Sir. I can perhaps include them in my classes.

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 16 днів тому

      @czarquetzal8344 circumstances have kept me from writing as much as I would like. I have published a monograph but my thoughts have developed considerably since then.

  • @gowrinandana8999
    @gowrinandana8999 17 днів тому

    Aren't there 5 cantos?

  • @rafaelsakarya
    @rafaelsakarya 18 днів тому

    Based on your title, is the goal to create a new and better literary theory or to fall back on an older one(s) which are thmesleves better?

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 18 днів тому

      New and better, which will be closer to the premodern ones

  • @kelpyjeez6607
    @kelpyjeez6607 18 днів тому

    No it isnt dumbass

  • @czarquetzal8344
    @czarquetzal8344 18 днів тому

    Neo-Aristotelian, doc?

    • @LitProf
      @LitProf 18 днів тому

      Not really, just find it useful to consider multiple perspectives on the question.

    • @czarquetzal8344
      @czarquetzal8344 17 днів тому

      @@LitProf the trend now is to revive older methods. I've heard of New Aestheticism. I don't know if I will include that in my Literary Criticism classes since it's a mere rehash of Beardsley's philosophy.

  • @Kyalo7374
    @Kyalo7374 19 днів тому

    Grateful for your lectures. Extremely insightful! Appreciate for making it available online

  • @AkaedatheLogtoad
    @AkaedatheLogtoad 20 днів тому

    What made you think a passive aggressive question wouldn’t go over well 😂 it is a legit question tho. Unless you just want to write for yourself

  • @Totallyfine29_
    @Totallyfine29_ 21 день тому

    Dr I am waiting for your new lectures, I already rewatched some because I noted some things in my notebook and went back to your videos where I heard them the first time. Also great editing